
| Key: |
SDAT-6
|
| Type: |
New Feature
|
| Status: |
Closed
|
| Resolution: |
Fixed
|
| Priority: |
Major
|
| Assignee: |
dinesh
|
| Reporter: |
Kinesia
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
|
File Attachments:
|
None
|
|
Image Attachments:
|
|
|
|
When holding shift down to get the 'full' view of the scandata, also show the how the colour price breaks down by different stack sizes to help you know which sizes you can undercut...
|
|
Description
|
When holding shift down to get the 'full' view of the scandata, also show the how the colour price breaks down by different stack sizes to help you know which sizes you can undercut... |
Show » |
|
However, it is buggy. In line 282:
if (dist.stack and #(dist.stack) > 1) then
#(dist.stack) is not returning the number of different stack sizes in the snapshot. For unstackable items it always appears to be 1. But for stackable items, I have seen it range from 0 to 8, and the number is not the number of stack sizes, nor the number of different price categories. I haven't been ale to figure out what it is indicating, but because it is not the number of stack sizes, it will sometimes hide or show the stack size breakdown at inappropriate times.
See attachment for some debugging output I've added to show the value of #(dist.stack) and then the breakdown of stacksizes actually in the snapshot for that item (these are correct, according to actual browse pane results).